On rational belief equilibria
نویسنده
چکیده
We study equilibria in which agent's belief are rational in the sense of Kurz 1-1994]. The market is formulated by specifying a stochastic demand function and a continuum of producers, each with a quadratic cost function who must select their output before knowing prices. Holding Rational Beliefs about future prices, producers maximize expected profits. In a Rational Belief Equilibrium (RBE) agents select diverse forecast functions but each one is rational in ~ e sense that it is based on a theory which cannot be rejected by the data. It is shown that there exists a continuum of RBE's and they could entail very different patterns of time series for the economy and consequently different aggregate levels of longterm volatility. Since the model contains exogenously specified random variables, the difference in the level of long-term volatility of prices among the different RBE's arises endogenously as an "amplification" of the volatility of exogenous variables. The paper derives exact bounds on the possible levels of such "amplification." JEL Classification: D5, D84, E37.
منابع مشابه
Approximate Knowledge of Rationality and Correlated Equilibria
We extend Aumann’s [3] theorem deriving correlated equilibria as a consequence of common priors and common knowledge of rationality by explicitly allowing for non-rational behavior. We replace the assumption of common knowledge of rationality with a substantially weaker notion, joint p-belief of rationality, where agents believe the other agents are rational with probabilities p = (pi)i∈I or mo...
متن کاملThe Hebrew University of Jerusalem
We extend Aumann’s [3] theorem deriving correlated equilibria as a consequence of common priors and common knowledge of rationality by explicitly allowing for non-rational behavior. We replace the assumption of common knowledge of rationality with a substantially weaker notion, joint p-belief of rationality, where agents believe the other agents are rational with probabilities p = (pi)i∈I or mo...
متن کاملBelief-free equilibria in games with incomplete information: Characterization and existence
We characterize belief-free equilibria in infinitely repeated games with incomplete information with N ≥ 2 players and arbitrary information structures. This characterization involves a new type of individual rational constraint linking the lowest equilibrium payoffs across players. The characterization is tight: we define a set of payoffs that contains all the belief-free equilibrium payoffs; ...
متن کاملBELIEF-FREE EQUILIBRIA IN GAMES WITH INCOMPLETE INFORMATION: CHARACTERIZATION AND EXISTENCE By
We characterize belief-free equilibria in infinitely repeated games with incomplete information with N ≥ 2 players and arbitrary information structures. This characterization involves a new type of individual rational constraint linking the lowest equilibrium payoffs across players. The characterization is tight: we define a set of payoffs that contains all the belief-free equilibrium payoffs; ...
متن کاملBelief-free equilibria in games with incomplete information: the N -player case
We characterize belief-free equilibria in infinitely repeated games with incomplete information with an arbitrary number of players and arbitrary information structures. This generalizes Hörner and Lovo (2008), which restrict attention to the two-player case and to information structures that have a product structure. Our characterization requires introducing a new type of individual rational c...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005